VHF and UHF antennas: Difference between revisions

From AD7ZJ Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
Line 18: Line 18:
==900 antenna==
==900 antenna==
I made this to get on the 900 Mhz ham band. Simple antenna to build from an "N" chassis mount connector. I have it sitting on top a 3/4 PVC pipe which is attached to the eaves of my roof.  
I made this to get on the 900 Mhz ham band. Simple antenna to build from an "N" chassis mount connector. I have it sitting on top a 3/4 PVC pipe which is attached to the eaves of my roof.  
[[File:900mhz_antenna.jpg|thumb|NanoVNA showing return loss]]
[[File:900mhz_antenna.jpg|thumb|Simple 900 Mhz Vertical]]


<br clear=all>
<br clear=all>
==1090 antenna==
==1090 antenna==
Not strictly ham radio, but 1090 is the frequency aircraft use to reply to ground based radar (mode A/C) as well as "extended squitter" mode S, usually carrying ADSB data. This particular antenna is used in one of my gliders to receive ADSB on PowerFLARM for collision avoidance. It's a dipole antenna and while a dipole is a poor match to a 50 ohm unbalanced feed, it's good enough to pick up aircraft within the range you care about. ADSB signals are broadcast with quite a bit of power so even a marginal antenna will pick them up from quite a distance.  
Not strictly ham radio, but 1090 is the frequency aircraft use to reply to ground based radar (mode A/C) as well as "extended squitter" mode S, usually carrying ADSB data. This particular antenna is used in one of my gliders to receive ADSB on PowerFLARM for collision avoidance. It's a dipole antenna and while a dipole is a poor match to a 50 ohm unbalanced feed, it's good enough to pick up aircraft within the range you care about. ADSB signals are broadcast with quite a bit of power so even a marginal antenna will pick them up from quite a distance.  

Latest revision as of 20:57, 15 August 2024

DIY Vertical antennas

If you want a simple omni-directional antenna, it's hard to beat a vertical. Advantageous over a dipole for focusing the signal more toward the horizon, they are simple to build and are usually sufficient for most vhf/uhf needs. There are lots of sites on the internet telling you how to calculate the length of the elements so I won't duplicate that here. My technique is to start with a quarter wavelength for the frequency you want, then connect an antenna analyzer (or in recent years, a nano-VNA) and trim until it resonates where you like.

A robust vertical antenna

Here's a design I came up with recently. It uses a chassis mount SO-239 connector with the elements soldered directly on. First I solder on the vertical element, then I solder on a piece of 1/2 copper pipe to go around it as a strain relief. Then solder/bolt on the radials. At the end, I fill the copper pipe up with epoxy. This gives a nice strain relief and has proven quite robust out in the elements. BTW it is important to at least paint the epoxy to protect it from UV.


DIY Yagi antennas

I ran across this design and I think it's really clever - a yagi with no gamma/hairpin match needed. It's designed for simple and quick construction. I've had it up for a couple years and it's worked really well. He has a couple excellent articles on this, search the following link for "Cheap yagi"

https://www.wa5vjb.com/references.html

CheapYagi on my roof


900 antenna

I made this to get on the 900 Mhz ham band. Simple antenna to build from an "N" chassis mount connector. I have it sitting on top a 3/4 PVC pipe which is attached to the eaves of my roof.

Simple 900 Mhz Vertical


1090 antenna

Not strictly ham radio, but 1090 is the frequency aircraft use to reply to ground based radar (mode A/C) as well as "extended squitter" mode S, usually carrying ADSB data. This particular antenna is used in one of my gliders to receive ADSB on PowerFLARM for collision avoidance. It's a dipole antenna and while a dipole is a poor match to a 50 ohm unbalanced feed, it's good enough to pick up aircraft within the range you care about. ADSB signals are broadcast with quite a bit of power so even a marginal antenna will pick them up from quite a distance.

NanoVNA showing return loss

The NanoVNA is a great tool for cutting antennas to length. Calculate the lengths to get it close, then trim as needed to nail the resonant point. I think these are so cool - so much functionality for so cheap! Obviously they don't have the dynamic range of a more expensive VNA but it's plenty good enough for a lot of projects.

NanoVNA showing return loss